People v. Tatera, 2018 IL App (2d) 160207 (May). Episode 498 (Duration 7:21) 9th DUI for this guy; 8 years seems about right.
Not On Their Watch: Reviewing Court Says This Guy Didn’t Do It
People v. Sanchez, 2018 IL App (1st) 143899 (April). Episode 488 (Duration 18:22) Involuntary confession and improper closing arguments lead to a murder conviction that is now reversed outright.
Big Problem In Lake County When State’s Attorney Didn’t Sign The Overhear Applications
People v. Allard, 2018 IL App (2d) 160927 (February). Episode 486 (Duration 9:35) Lake County SA didn’t sign the applications for the recorded phone calls so they are invalid.
Prior Inconsistent Statement Error Leads To A Do-Over
People v. Anderson, 2018 IL App (1st) 150931 (March). Episode 482 (Duration 8:41) Statement errors means this murder is going back for a new trial.
When Police Investigate The Police
Garrity v. New Jersey, 385 U.S. 493, 87 S.Ct. 616 (1967). Episode 481 (Duration 11:39: Police investigations and follow up prosecutions of other police officers involve slightly different constitutional concerns. What are they?
Murder Confession Crossed The Line When They Called Him A “Baby Killer”
People v. Phillips, 2018 IL App (3d) 130270 (February). Episode 479 (Duration 13:35) 18-year-old’s confession ruled involuntary, in part, because defendant is told baby killers get killed in prison.
What Margin Of Error? If Breathalyzer Says .08 You’re Guilty
People v. Robledo, 2018 IL App (2d) 151142 (February). Episode 470 (Duration 7:10) Defendant blew .082 she argued the margin of error of the machine means the state didn’t prove she was .08.
DUI Expert Says Blood In The Mouth Leads To Unreliable Breathalyzer Results
People v. Ernsting, 2018 IL App (5th) 160330 (January). Episode 454 (Duration 9:07) Ronald Henson testified that blood in the mouth produces unreliable breathalyzer results and would tend to produce a disproportionately higher BAC.
Admitting Evidence To Demonstrate Police Course Of Conduct Is Probably A Losing Argument
People v. Horine, 2017 IL App (4th) 170128 (December). Episode 448 (Duration 16:18) Judge and prosecutor get into it on whether or not the state could admit this hearsay evidence during this SSS hearing.
During A Surveillance Privilege Argument Exactly Who Gets To Go Back There For The In Camera Inspection
People v. Jackson, 2017 IL App (1st) 151779 (November). Episode 432 (Duration 10:24) During an in camera inspection on the surveillance privilege the trial judge must not allow the state attorney to participate, must elicit the exact location from the officer, and conclude with giving the defense a chance to rebut.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- …
- 8
- Next Page »