People v. Webb, 2023 IL 128957 (November). Episode 1018 (Duration 8:03)
Our circuit and appellate courts are bound to apply that precedent to the “facts of the case before them under the fundamental principle of stare decisis.”
[Read more…]By Samuel Partida, Jr.
People v. Webb, 2023 IL 128957 (November). Episode 1018 (Duration 8:03)
Our circuit and appellate courts are bound to apply that precedent to the “facts of the case before them under the fundamental principle of stare decisis.”
[Read more…]By Samuel Partida, Jr.
People v. Mallery, 2023 IL App (4th) 220528 (April). Episode 989 (Duration 6:52)
Probable cause for the vehicle search existed based upon the canine’s positive alert, and the trial court erred in finding otherwise.
[Read more…]By Samuel Partida, Jr.
People v. Sanchez, 2021 IL App (3d) 170410 (February). Episode 877 (Duration 5:25)
Dog sniff 7 minutes into this traffic stop did not unreasonably prolong the traffic stop.
[Read more…]By Samuel Partida, Jr.
People v. Lindsey, 2020 IL 124289 (April). Episode 764 (Duration 11:33)
Dogs sniffing outside doors again; this time it’s a motel room.
Read moreBy Samuel Partida, Jr.
People v. Bujari, 2020 IL App (3d) 190028 (February). Episode 737 (Duration 15:07)
Officer walks the dog around the truck before the truck driver has a chance to pull away.
[Read more…]By Samuel Partida, Jr.
People v. Jordan, 2019 IL App (4th) 190223 (December). Episode 720 (Duration 9:23)
Officers approach a young man in a car and get the dog out to sniff, was that reasonable?
[Read more…]By Samuel Partida, Jr.
Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S. 405 (2005). SCOTIS Notice (Duration 1:43)
This is the SCOTUS case that set the framework for the use of drug dogs in the United States. [Read more…]
By Samuel Partida, Jr.
People v. Kruckenberg, 2019 IL App (3d) 170505-U. Episode 628 (Duration 31:43).
Matthew Paulson and Larry Vandersnick describe a drug interdiction traffic stop and analyze where it went wrong for the prosecution.
By Samuel Partida, Jr.
People v. Sadeq, 2018 IL App (4th) 160105 (November). Episode 563 (Duration 15:18)
Steigmann says the delay to have the drug dog come out was justified because defendant was, in part, extremely nervous.
[Read more…]By Samuel Partida, Jr.
People v. Bonilla, 2018 IL 122484 (October). Episode 552 (Duration 8:50)
Constitutional violation did not depend on whether the common door to the apartment was locked.
[Read more…]