Kane County Nuggets

Internal education and training for the Kane County State's Attorney's Office.

  • Episodes
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Login

Crossing Lanes To Enter An Exit Ramp Is Not Illegal

September 12, 2022 By Samuel Partida, Jr.

People v. Kaczkowski, 2020 IL App (3d) 170764 (September). Episode 816 (Duration 5:01)

Traffic stop was based on signaling, crossing multiple lanes of travel, and then exiting the freeway.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Mistake of Law, Traffic Stop

Rule Of Lenity Explanation

June 2, 2020 By Samuel Partida, Jr.

Sometimes when lawyers are trying to make sense of the criminal law two different laws may appear to contradict themselves.

What should happen in those situations?

Then rule of lenity is applied. So what is the rule of lenity?

Rule Of Lenity

The rule of lenity is:

“The judicial doctrine holding that a court, in construing an ambiguous criminal statute that sets out multiple or inconsistent punishments, should resolve the ambiguity in favor of the more lenient punishment.”

Black’s Law Dictionary (11th ed. 2019).

The Illinois Supreme Court has stated, “under the rule of lenity, we adopt the more lenient interpretation of a criminal statute when, after consulting traditional canons of statutory construction, we are left with an ambiguous statute.” People v. Gaytan, 2015 IL 116223, ¶ 39, 32 N.E.3d 641.

Example Of The Rule Of Lenity

Consider the case of People v. Rowell, 2020 IL App (4th) 190231 (April). Episode 766 (Duration 5:32) as an example of where the rule lenity was applied.

Defendant was challenging the state’s attempt to sentence her to 180 days i jail. The state said they were merely section 11-501(c)(3) of the Vehicle Code (625 ILCS 5/11-501(c)(3)) which required her to serve a minimum of 180 days’ imprisonment.

Defendant argued the plain language of the statute is permissive rather than mandatory, noting section 11-501(c)(3) lacks words like “mandatory” or “shall” with regard to the six months of imprisonment, which are included elsewhere in section 11-501.

The court had to determine whether the legislature intended section 11-501(c)(3) to require a trial court to impose a minimum of six months’ imprisonment as part of defendant’s sentence.

The Statute At Issue

625 ILCS 5/11-501(c)(3)

At issue in this case was section 11-501(c)(3) of the Vehicle Code (625 ILCS 5/11- 501(c)(3)), which states:

“A person who violates subsection (a) is subject to 6 months of imprisonment, an additional mandatory minimum fine of $1,000, and 25 days of community service in a program benefiting children if the person was transporting a person under the age of 16 at the time of the violation.”

625 ILCS 5/11-501(c)(3).

Problems With The Statue

The defense pointed out that the statute did not make use of the words “mandatory” or shall which are the understood terms used to document a required provision.

In different sections of 11-501 the law makers in fact did use the term “mandatory” or “shall” to explicitly say when something is required rather than merely be discreationary.

Finally, the defense could point to more serious DUI charges that don’t require 180 days in jail.

The Prosecution Said

The State noted that defendant already faced the possibility of being sentenced to 364 days in jail, for a Class A misdemeanor conviction.

Thus, the phrase “is subject to 6 months of imprisonment” would be entirely superfluous unless it is interpreted to require 6 months of incarceration.

Holding

While this argument has appeal, we are reluctant to insert the word “mandatory” into the statute where it does not exist.

The court finally pointed to the rule of lenity to rule that the 180 days of jail were not necessarily required.

The court said section 11-501(c)(3) should not be construed to impose a mandatory minimum period of 6 months’ imprisonment. The case was sent back to the trial court for a new sentencing hearing.

Filed Under: Mistake of Law, Sentencing

Highway 136 In Carthage Illinois Has A Weird Line Painted On The Roadway

February 18, 2019 By Samuel Partida, Jr.

People v. Bowden, 2019 IL App (3d) 170654 (February). Episode 591 (Duration 11:29)

Mistake of law case; Theus is under attack. The traffic stop here was based on crossing a painted line.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Mistake of Law

Improper Lane Usage And A Traffic Stop But The Lines Were Drawn Weird

February 18, 2019 By Samuel Partida, Jr.

People v. Bowden, 2019 IL App (3d) 170654 (February). Episode 591 (Duration 11:29)

Another example of evidence that was admitted to demonstrate the course of the police investigation. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Mistake of Law, Podcast, Reasonable Suspicion, Traffic Stop

Downstate Police Department Takes Advantage Of This Weird Traffic Line To Stop Cars

February 18, 2019 By Samuel Partida, Jr.

People v. Bowden, 2019 IL App (3d) 170654 (February). Episode 591 (Duration 11:29)

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Mistake of Law, Police

An Illinois Case Law Review of Mistake Of Law Opinions: The Barney Fife Traffic Stop

January 14, 2019 By Samuel Partida, Jr.


Episode 579 (Duration 16:25) What is happening in Illinois with the mistake of law doctrine?

[Read more…]

Filed Under: DUI, Mistake of Law, Podcast, Traffic Stop

Illinois Traffic Rule For Making A Proper Left Hand Turn: When Can You Get Stopped By Police

September 17, 2018 By Samuel Partida, Jr.

People v. Walker, 2018 IL App (4th) 170877 (September). Episode 536 (Duration 10:58)

Turns out we’ve been misreading the “proper turn” statute all along.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Mistake of Law, Traffic Stop

Mistake Of Law Doctrine Requires A Genuinely Ambiguous Law

July 2, 2018 By Samuel Partida, Jr.

In re Maurice J., 2018 IL App (1st) 172123 (June). Episode 506 (Duration 8:18)

Officer not knowing the traffic law he says he was enforcing is not the same as being reasonably confused about the law. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Mistake of Law, Police

Maybe All Traffic Laws Are Susceptible to Mistaken Interpretation By The Police: Mistake Of Law On When To Use A Turn Signal

September 30, 2016 By Samuel Partida, Jr.

People v. Theus, 2016 IL App (4th) 160139 (September). Episode 238 (Duration 8:47)

Car is stopped for jerking to the left when the single lane road opens up into 2 lanes. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Mistake of Law, Police

Traffic Stop Based on Reasonable Mistake of Law is Not Illegal

January 26, 2015 By Samuel Partida, Jr.


See People v. Gaytan, 2015 IL 116223 (May). Episode 073 (Duration 21:40)

It turns out that a traffic stop based on reasonable mistake of law is not illegal. What happens when a police officer stops a car [Read more…]

Filed Under: Mistake of Law, Police

Categories

  • Accountability
  • Aggravated Assault
  • Aggravated Battery
  • Appeal
  • Bail
  • Battery
  • Burglary
  • Case List
  • Case List
  • Charges
  • Conceal and Carry
  • Confession
    • Attenuation
    • Miranda
    • Voluntary
  • Conflict Of Interest
  • Constitutional
  • Contempt Of Court
  • Criminal Damage
  • Criminal Possession
  • Discovery
  • Dismissal
  • Disorderly Conduct
  • Double Jeopardy
  • DUI
    • Actual Physical Control
    • Blood
    • Breathalyzer
    • DRE
    • Field Sobriety Tests
    • Proximate Cause
    • Suspension
  • Evidence
    • 115-10
    • Accomplice Testimony
    • DNA
    • Expert
    • Eyewitness
    • Hearsay
    • Opinion
    • Other Crimes
    • Over Hear
    • Prior Consistent Statement
    • Prior Inconsistent Statement
    • Privilege
    • Surveillance Privilege
  • Expungement
  • Felony Murder
  • Fitness For Trial
  • Forfeiture
  • Grand Jury
  • Guilty Plea
  • Illinois Gun Crimes
    • Armed Violence
    • Reckless Discharge
    • UUW
  • Immigration
  • Indictment
  • Ineffective Assistance
    • Krankel Hearing
  • Judicial Bias
  • Jury Instructions
  • Jury Misconduct
  • Juvenile Justice
  • Leaving The Scene
  • Lesser-Included
  • Mental State
    • Knowing
    • Recklessness
    • Sexual Gratification
  • Mob Action
  • Notice Requirement
  • Obstructing Justice
  • Podcast
  • Police
  • Postconviction Petition
  • Procedure
  • Professional Responsibility
    • Conflict Of Interest
  • Prosecutorial Misconduct
  • Resisting Arrest
  • SCOTUS
  • Search & Seizure
    • Anonymous Tip
    • Community Care Taking
    • Consent To Search
    • Drug Dog
    • Exigent Circumstances
    • Good Faith Exception
    • Mistake of Law
    • Pat Down
    • Plain View
    • Probable Cause
    • Reasonable Suspicion
    • Search Incident To Arrest
    • Strip Search
    • Traffic Stop
    • Warrant
  • Second Degree Murder
  • Sentencing
    • Aggravation
    • Consecutive
    • Credit For Time Served
    • Dangerous Weapon
    • Enhancement
    • Extended Term
    • Fines & Fees
    • Forcible Felony
    • Gun Add-On
    • Life Sentence
    • Mandatory X
    • Merging Counts
    • Mitigation
    • Probation
    • Restitution
  • Sex Case
    • Child Porn
    • SORA
  • Speedy Trial
  • Statute of Limitations
  • Structural Error
  • Theft
  • Threatening A Public Official
  • Trial
    • Affirmative Defense
    • Batson
    • Closing Argument
    • Confrontation
    • Immunity
    • Impeachment
    • Insanity Defense
    • Necessity Defense
    • Opening Statement
    • Pretrial Publicity
    • Self Defense
    • Stipulation
  • Vehicular Hijacking
  • Warrant

Copyright © 2023 ● Disclaimer