CLE for lawyers through a podcast.
By Samuel Partida, Jr.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download (2.7MB)
Subscribe: Android | RSS | More
People v. Williams, 2020 IL App (1st) 172992 (June). Episode 797 (Duration 4:43)
Officer A said he smelled marijuana, Officer B searched the car so the court reversed the conviction.
Read moreBy Samuel Partida, Jr.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download (8.6MB)
Subscribe: Android | RSS | More
People v. Bailey, 2019 IL App (3d) 180396 (May). Episode 631 (Duration 15:01)
Food in your beard is not particularly indicative of anything.
[Read more…]By Samuel Partida, Jr.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download (6.4MB)
Subscribe: Android | RSS | More
People v. Campbell, 2019 IL App (1st) 161640 (April). Episode 630 (Duration 11:07)
Court is not insensitive to claims of “dropsy” testimony and “testilying.”
[Read more…]By Samuel Partida, Jr.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download (8.7MB)
Subscribe: Android | RSS | More
People v. Rice, 2019 IL App (3d) 170134 (April). Episode 623 (Duration 7:36)
A strong indication from the 3rd district on what the smell of weed means for a car search.
[Read more…]By Samuel Partida, Jr.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download (7.5MB)
Subscribe: Android | RSS | More
People v. Hill, 2020 IL 124595 (March). Episode 753 (Duration 13:00)
Smell of cannabis plus other things still justify a search.
Read moreBy Samuel Partida, Jr.
After Illinois passed the Cannabis Regulation and Tax Act which became effective in 2020, can police still search a car when they smell cannabis? Episode 745 (Duration 44:50)
[Read more…]By Samuel Partida, Jr.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download (7.4MB)
Subscribe: Android | RSS | More
People v. Hill, 2019 IL App (4th) 180041 (January). Episode 584 (Duration 16:08)
Officer sees passenger riding low in the seat and thinks it may be a guy wanted on warrant, turns out it wasn’t him.
[Read more…]