People v. Garcia, 2021 IL App (1st) 190026 (December). Episode 856 (Duration 7:19)
An EHM agreement usually requires a defendant to agree to allow warrantless searches of his home, these agreements will be accepted by the courts.
[Read more…]By Samuel Partida, Jr.
People v. Garcia, 2021 IL App (1st) 190026 (December). Episode 856 (Duration 7:19)
An EHM agreement usually requires a defendant to agree to allow warrantless searches of his home, these agreements will be accepted by the courts.
[Read more…]By Samuel Partida, Jr.
People v. Reyes, 2020 IL App (2d) 170379 (November). Episode 836 (Duration 13:14)
In execution of a search warrant general search for GPS data and plain view doctrine allow police to do a more general search of a phone.
[Read more…]By Samuel Partida, Jr.
People v. Williams, 2020 IL App (1st) 190418 (July). Episode 801 (Duration 8:02)
Error for the trial court to suppress evidence based on a Frank’s Hearing that showed the apartment had 5 bedrooms and not 4.
[Read more…]By Samuel Partida, Jr.
People v. Johnson, 2020 IL App (1st) 172987 (May). Episode 783 (Duration 7:40)
Parolees have less constitutional protection when it comes to a search of their home.
Read moreBy Samuel Partida, Jr.
People v. Ortega, 2020 IL App (1st) 162516 (April). Episode 768 (Duration 9:25)
Defendants paid a bailer to transport a car from CA to IL, when the driver found a funny package in the car he called police.
Read moreBy Samuel Partida, Jr.
People v. Jones, 2020 IL App (3d) 170674 (April). Episode 765 (Duration 15:51)
Two controlled buys done outside the home and police got a search warrant for inside the home. Was that enough for a warrant?
Read moreBy Samuel Partida, Jr.
People v. Braswell, 2019 IL App (1st) 172810 (December). Episode 728 (Duration 8:03)
A different panel in the first district declines to hold the CPD investigative hold alert unconstitutional.
Read moreBy Samuel Partida, Jr.
People v. McCavitt, 2019 IL App (3d) 170830 (November). Episode 716 (Duration 9:52)
Defendant was acquitted of criminal sexual assault but they didn’t look at the computer to carefully, state did not have the right to reexamine the computer year’s later.
[Read more…]By Samuel Partida, Jr.
People v. Teague, 2019 IL App (3d) 170017 (October). Episode 700 (Duration 11:08)
Police get a search warrant for his house based on one control buy that did not occur at his house. [Read more…]
By Samuel Partida, Jr.
People v. Wood, 2019 IL App (5th) 180336 (September). Episode 677 (Duration 14:49)
Community caretaking function justifies a warrantless entry into a home. [Read more…]
By Samuel Partida, Jr.
People v. Jarvis, 2016 IL App (2d) 141231 (February). Episode 146 (Duration 4:33)
The visual examination of defendant’s buttocks might have exposed defendant’s anus. However, there was no visual inspection of the interior of defendant’s anus, let alone any physical intrusion.
[Read more…]By Samuel Partida, Jr.
People v. Chambers, 2016 IL 117911 (January). Episode 134 (Duration 8:58)
Defendant should have been granted a Franks Hearing, People v. Gorosteata, 374 Ill. App. 3d 203 (2007) is overruled.
[Read more…]