IllinoisCaseLaw.com

Home of the Criminal Nuggets Podcast.

Persistent Aggressive Deputies Push Their Way Into A Home Under A Pretext Of Providing Aid

May 16, 2016 By Arthur McGibbons

People v. Swanson, 2016 IL App (2d) 150340 (May). Episode 168 (Duration 6:16)

Deputies investigating a single car accident make a warrantless and unconstitutional entry into defendant’s home.

Facts

Police were investigating a single car accident when then appeared at defendant’s home.

The said they would not leave until they talked to defendant. They pushed their way inside the house and forced defendant to come downstairs to talk to them.

They then arrest him for DUI.

Consent or No Consent

The chief evil against which the fourth amendment is directed is the entry into the home.

The wife did not grant consent for the officers to enter the home. She told the officers repeatedly that she and defendant did not need help, that the officers did not need to be there, and that they could leave.

Moreover, she did so mostly through a closed storm door.

Although at one point she opened the storm door slightly, she did so only to facilitate communication between her and the officers. This was not a gesture for the officers to come inside.

To the contrary, when she did crack open the door, it was the deputy who opened the door farther and walked in without permission.

Emergency Aid?

Nor was this a situation where the police were justified to enter to administer emergency aid.

Defendant had been in an automobile accident and had been exposed for over an hour to extremely inclement weather.

Neither circumstance, however, constituted, at the time of the entry into the home, an emergency requiring the police to provide aid.

First, the police must have reasonable grounds to believe that there is an emergency at hand.

Second, they must have some reasonable basis, approaching probable cause, to connect the emergency with the area entered or searched. Neither element was met here.

Holding

It was not reasonable to conclude that defendant needed aid when his wife was providing it. If he did need aid from the officers, his wife would not have persisted in telling the officers that he was fine and that he did not need medical help.

The warrantless entry into the home was unconstitutional.

See Also

Search & Seizure Resource Page

Check out the
Illinois Search And Seizure Resource Page 
to learn more about the 4th amendment. 

and

Illinois DUI Resource Page

Check out the Illinois DUI Resource Page
to learn more about DUI in Illinois.

Filed Under: Consent To Search, DUI, Police

Where’s Samuel Partida, Jr.?

Samuel Partida, Jr.Samuel Partida, Jr. is now prosecuting criminal law cases in an Illinois county near you. He is, therefore, unavailable to answer questions on this site. Always remember, there is no substitute for steady, persistent attention to the cases.

FREE SPECIAL REPORT
For Illinois Police Officers & Lawyers.

Free Printed Edition
The Ultimate Police Guide To A Legal Car Search…

Illinois Search & Seizure Guide For Police

Catch Up Quickly With
Everything You Missed
In Car Search Law!

Click here to claim your FREE car search guide.

© 2021 · Steady Persistent Attention To The Cases Is Never Wrong · Disclaimer