IllinoisCaseLaw.com

Illinois Criminal Law Podcast

Can You Possess A Shank In Prison If You Can Prove Your in Danger?

July 6, 2016 By Samuel Partida, Jr.

People v. Boston, 2016 IL App (1st) 133497 (May). Episode 192 (Duration 5:42)

Was it error for trial court to deny defendant the necessity instruction for possessing a shank in jail when he could prove he was stabbed and in danger?

Facts

Defendant was busted with a shank while in the Cook Count jail.

He had witnesses that said he was stabbed and in fights with other inmates.

Nonetheless, the trial court denied the necessity instruction because the threats against him were not immediate.

Necessity Defense

It looks like the jury was asking about a self defense instruction. A defendant is entitled to an instruction on his theory of the case where there is some evidence to support the giving of the instruction.

The defense of necessity involves the following elements: (1) the person claiming the defense was without blame in occasioning or developing the situation; and (2) the person reasonably believed that his conduct was necessary to avoid a greater public or private injury than that which might have reasonably resulted from his own conduct.

720 ILCS 5/7-13.

Difficult To Prove

The defense of necessity applies when the threat of harm was immediate, and defendant's conduct was the sole option to avoid injury.

This defense usually involves the choice between two admitted evils where other optional courses of action are unavailable, and “the conduct chosen must promote some higher value than the value of literal compliance with the law.”

“[T]he defense of necessity arises when a person reasonably believes his conduct, which would otherwise constitute an offense, was necessary to avoid a public or private injury greater than the injury which might have resulted from his conduct.”

Analysis

Here, because defendant was charged with possessing a weapon in a penal institution, a review of whether he presented some evidence to support a necessity instruction involves additional considerations.

Accordingly, in this context the court looked at whether:

“(1) the prisoner is faced with a specific threat of death, forcible sexual attack or substantial bodily injury in the immediate future; (2) there is no time for a complaint to the authority or there exists a history of futile complaints which make any result from such complaint illusory; and (3) there is no time or opportunity to resort to the courts.”

Here the reviewing court found that any threat to defendant was to remote in time.

None of the attacks constituted a specific and immediate threat to defendant.

This was not a situation where he made repeated reports to prison officials that went ignored. He had ample opportunity to alert the authorities from the safety of his own cell. Otherwise, to allow inmates to possess weapons in any but the most desperate situations would defy common sense and exacerbate an already difficult and precarious security situation.

See also Govan, 169 Ill. App. 3d at 338 (considering the applicability of a necessity defense to a charge of unlawful possession of a weapon by a felon in a Department of Corrections facility).

Filed Under: Defenses, Podcast

 

Are You Ready To Earn CLE While You Employ A System That Allows You To Consistently Outmatch & Outgun Your Opposition?

If you have 10 minutes a day (sometimes less), a phone, and know how to push play then this may be for you.

Learn More

Click Here To Learn More.

Blogger, Podcaster and Now Author…

Learn More Now
Available on iTunes = subscribe on iTunes Available on Google Podcasts Subscribe on Android subscribe to rss feed

FREE Ethics CLE For Illinois Lawyers

Free Ethics CLE For Illinois Lawyers

In this one hour course on professionalism you’ll discover how busy criminal law attorneys find the time to kill it in court. Register below to get instant access to this free ethics CLE.

Listen Now!

Criminal Nuggets Podcast with Samuel Partida, Jr. | a criminal law podcast

Premium Nuggets Podcast | A subscription legal service for Illinois criminal law attorneys

free illinois criminal law webinars and courses

Free Legal Resource For Illinois Attorneys

Free Legal Resource For Illinois Attorneys

Download My Most Popular Case Lists

I've been gathering the cases & one line summaries of the most important criminal law topics.

Get The Cases

Are You Ready To Consistently Outmatch & Outgun Your Criminal Litigation Opposition?

Samuel Partida, Jr. Case Law NinjaHow do you get a judge to do what you want and dominate your courtroom?

Show Me The Secret Now

 

Procedure

Search & Seizure

Evidence

Defenses

Sentencing

Tags

Appeal Attenuation Batson Confession Conflict Of Interest Confrontation Consent Constitutional Discovery Dismissal Double Jeopardy Drug Dog Expert Expungement Extended Term Eyewitness Gun Add-On Hearsay Impeachment Indictment Ineffective Assistance Instructions Jury Juvenile Lesser-Included Life Sentence Mental State Mitigation Notice Other Crimes Postconviction Petition Prior Inconsistent Statement Probable Cause Probation Prosecutorial Misconduct Reasonable Doubt Reasonable Suspicion SCOTUS Speedy Trial Sufficiency of the Evidence Suspended License Traffic Stop UUW Warrant Witness
  • About
  • Free Podcast
  • Resources
  • Login

© 2019 Copyright · Illinois Crimes Index · Illinois Sentencing Index · Disclaimer