IllinoisCaseLaw.com

Home of the Criminal Nuggets Podcast.

Top March Illinois Criminal Law Cases 2016

April 6, 2016 By Arthur McGibbons

The Illinois Supreme Court released 4 criminal cases for March 2016. 3 went for the defense, but that last one for the State really hurt…

Illinois criminal case list for March 2016

Here are the top 13 criminal law cases from the Illinois court system for March 2016. The first 4 are from the Illinois Supreme Court. Number 4 was a victory for the defense at the lower level; the Illinois Supreme Court had something to say about that.

1. People v. Burns
The “no-nights visits” rule is affirmed, can’t bring the sniffer dog to your front step for a little sniff action. Go to case.

2.  People v. Bradford
Prosecution no longer allowed to overcharge an ordinary retail theft to a burglary. Go to case.

3. People v. Clark
Aggravated vehicular hijacking and armed robbery without a firearm are not lesser-included offenses of aggravated vehicular hijacking and armed robbery with a firearm. Go to case.

4. People v. Carter
The discovery of this gun exceeded the scope of the search warrant, thus it was suppressed. Cop’s went back in after the search was “over.” Go to case.

5. People v. Timmsen
Apparently, the police can stop you for trying to legally avoid a roadblock. Go to case.

6. People v. Abram
Officers approach defendant who was sitting in his car he then, to say the least, ensues in outright flight. Go to case.

7. People v. Smith
This trial judge was overruled; there is nothing unconstitutional about requesting citizen’s to roll up their sleeves. Go to case.

8. People v. Thompson
Some of the State’s remarks relied on questionable advocacy, but did not rise to the level of clear and obvious error. Go to case.

9. People v. Meuris
In a leaving the scene of an accident prosecution the State must not only prove that Defendant knew he was involved in an accident but also that another person was involved. Go to case.

10. People v. Weinke
Reviewing court says ASA exaggerated the severity of victim’s condition and misled the court as to the source and timing of her information in order to pressure the court into granting a quickie deposition. Go to case.

11. People v. Tayborn
Trial counsel was ineffective for not challenging defendant’s confession given without Miranda warnings. Go to case.

12. People v. Little
Cigarette break is not a sufficient amount of time to remove the taint of the original Miranda violation. Go to case.

13. People v. Gray
These drug officers were themselves charged with distributing narcotics and Defendant was not told about the investigation before he plead guilty to his own drug charges. Go to case.

14. People v. Fulton
In a charge of armed habitual criminal the same conviction can be used as one of the predicate offenses as well the predicate to the UUW Felony conviction that may be being used. Go to case.

Filed Under: Case List

Where’s Samuel Partida, Jr.?

Samuel Partida, Jr.Samuel Partida, Jr. is now prosecuting criminal law cases in an Illinois county near you. He is, therefore, unavailable to answer questions on this site. Always remember, there is no substitute for steady, persistent attention to the cases.

FREE SPECIAL REPORT
For Illinois Police Officers & Lawyers.

Free Printed Edition
The Ultimate Police Guide To A Legal Car Search…

Illinois Search & Seizure Guide For Police

Catch Up Quickly With
Everything You Missed
In Car Search Law!

Click here to claim your FREE car search guide.

Comments

  1. Bob Nemzin says

    April 8, 2016 at 11:55 am

    Sam, you are awesome and your passion for the law is quite apparent. I greatly appreciate your work.

    Bob Nemzin

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

© 2021 · Steady Persistent Attention To The Cases Is Never Wrong · Disclaimer